News: E-Blast

As we approach our 7th year in business, it brings us so much joy to be a part of such a strong community of professionals. Thank you all. Click here for holiday video message

Registration has now opened for the following events: 24th Annual Workers’ Compensation Seminar – Thursday, September 18, 2025 from 7:30 AM – 5:00 PM 2nd Annual General Liability Pre-conference Workshop – Wednesday, September 17, 2025 from 2:00 PM – 5:00 PM Agenda:  Coming Soon! Location:  The Westin Richmond, 6631 W Broad St, Richmond, VA 23230 We hope to see you at these events!

Click here to watch this month’s one minute adjuster tip that is on the topic of:  Unlawful Employees

The Full Commission in the recent Opinion of Powell v. Haverty Furniture Company, Inc., JCN: 2317668 (November 18, 2024) reversed the decision of the Deputy Commissioner and allowed a claim for alleged “underpaid” medical bills after the parties had reached a settlement and an Order was entered. The Order provided that defendant would pay for “any unpaid, reasonable and necessary medical expenses for treatment rendered” to the claimant through date of entry of the Order. The Full Commission held that this language, again, did not preclude the claimant from seeking full payment of medical expenses incurred by the claimant but...

During this season of gratitude, we want to express our sincere appreciation to you. Your loyalty, feedback, and support have been essential to our journey. We wish you joy and a wonderful Thanksgiving!

Clients are often surprised when the legal advice provided differs when the case is being heard across the river. The matter of difference is simple: the Commonwealth of Virginia has a reputation of being considered an “Employer-friendly” jurisdiction. For example, Virginia allows time for Employers to fully investigate claims prior to accepting compensability and without having to defend against allegations of delay by the Claimant or their attorney. In comparison, the workers’ compensation laws of the District of Columbia are “Claimant-friendly”. In keeping with the prior example, DC allows for delay arguments without specification and more often than not, a...

For an injury to be compensable under the Virginia Workers’ Compensation Act, a claimant must prove that the injury arose out of and in the course and scope of his employment. An injury occurs “in the course of employment” when it takes place within the period of employment, at a place where the employee may be reasonably expected to be, and while he is reasonably fulfilling the duties of his employment or is doing something which is reasonably incidental thereto.” However, Virginia has adopted three doctrines which expands the “course of employment” prong of a compensable injury. These doctrines include...

In Virginia, an injured worker to prevail must establish an injury by accident arising out of and in the course of the employment.   Not all accidents that occur in the workplace are compensable. It is important that the Virginia adjuster recognize that an injured worker must establish an injury by accident resulting in a structural or mechanical change to the body.  The Full Commission’s very recent decision in Curtis Martin, Jr. v. Mastec, Inc., JCN VA00001918587 (August 13, 2024) offers a good discussion of this requirement. In Curtis Martin, the Full Commission, in a split 2-1 decision, affirmed the finding...

Click here to watch this month’s one minute adjuster tip that is on the topic of: Legal Minute: Ladders   Should you have any questions about the issues discussed here or other legal issues, please do not hesitate to contact the lawyers at Ford Richardson. Ford Richardson is a full-service law firm with headquarters located in Richmond’s financial district and satellite offices in Roanoke, Fairfax and Virginia Beach and Washington, D.C.. Our commitment to our clients is simple: offer top-tier clear legal solutions that allow our clients to excel in their business. We are privileged to give back to our community...

On July 11, 2024, The United States Court of Appeals (“COA”) for the Third Circuit in response to a motion to dismiss filed by the defendants in Johnson, et al. v. National Collegiate Athletic Association, et al., denied the defendant’s motion and instead held that student athletes are not barred from being considered employees under the Fair Labor Standards Act (“FLSA”). Yes, in a decision that might well represent the last nail in the coffin for the NCAA’s “amateurism” argument, the court took the position that college athletes whose efforts primarily benefit their schools may qualify as employees deserving of...